The Utilization of Wild Animals in Mubri Wariori Village, Manokwari West Papua


The utilization of wild animals to meet human needs has existed throughout history. This study aims to identify the utilization of wild animals by in Mubri Wariori village, the trend of wild animals’ utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic and the conservation programs that are applied to the wild animal populations by the hunters and the community in Mubri Wariori village. The data were collected through open interviews to seven respondents. The Snowball sampling technique was used to determine the respondents. The respondents are all the people who hunt wild animals in the village. The data was analysed descriptively. The result revealed that there are 13 species of wild animals that have been utilized by the hunters and the community in Mubri Wariori. The wild animal is mostly used for household consumption, sold for cash and other usages. This knowledge has been passed down from generation to generation. The respondents have a good understanding of the Covid-19 disease cause and the possibility of some diseases coming from their interaction with wild animals. During the Covid-19 pandemic, market demand for wild animals has increased. Thus, the respondents hunt more frequent, from once a week to five times a week. However, the respondents do not wear protective equipment such as gloves and mask in the process of handling wild animals. The ways that according to the respondents are effective in killing bacteria and viruses are by washing hands and boiling the wild animals’ meat for a long time. Moreover, the respondents and the community has realized the importance of wild animals’ conservation and has implemented conservation efforts for the bird of paradise and turtles.


Albuquerque, U. P., Silva, J. S., Campos, J. L. A., Sousa, R. S., Silva, T. C., & Alves, R. R. N. (2013). The current status of ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and perspectives. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 9(1), 1-9.

Alves, R. R. N. (2012). Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiology and conservation, 1.

Alves, R. R., & Souto, W. M. (2011). Ethnozoology in Brazil: current status and perspectives. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 7(1), 1-19.

Bakri, M., & Balqis, U. (2018). Gambaran histopatologi limpa Babi hutan (Sus scrofa) yang terinfeksi parasite internal di Kawasan Lhoknga Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Masyarakat Veteriner, 2(4), 515-523.

Brown, C. (2004). Emerging zoonoses and pathogens of public health significance--an overview. Revue scientifique et technique-office international des epizooties, 23(2), 435-442.

Budiman, M. A. K., & Christian, Y. (2019). Struktur Pemanfaatan Keragaman Hayati Satwa Liar oleh Masyarakat di Kawasan Pesisir Distrik Tomu Kabupaten Teluk Bintuni Papua Barat. Coastal and Ocean Journal, 2(2).

D’Cruze, N., Green, J., Elwin, A., & Schmidt-Burbach, J. (2020). Trading tactics: Time to rethink the global trade in wildlife. Animals, 10(12), 2456.

Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal conservation, 13(5), 458-466.

Luxmoore, R. A. (1989). Impact on conservation. Wildlife production systems: economic utilisation of wild ungulates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 413-423.

Pattiselanno, F. (2003). The wildlife value: example from West Papua, Indonesia. Tiger Paper, 30(1), 27-29.

Saleh, M. R. (2021). Hutan Papua, Bencana Ekologi dan Ekosida. Mongabay.

Sambodo, P., & Tethool, A. (2012). Endoparasit dalam Feses Bandikut (Echymipera kalubu)(Studi Awal Kejadian Zoonotik Parasitik dari Satwa Liar). Jurnal Imlu Ternak dan Tanaman, 2 (2), 71-74.

Selier, S. A. J., & Di Minin, E. (2015). Monitoring required for effective sustainable use of wildlife. Animal conservation, 18(2), 131-132.

Sikatta, F. O. A., & Adisasmito, W. B. B. (2020). Resiko Perilaku Konsumsi Satwa Liar Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Infeksi Emerging (Pie): Tinjauan Literatur. IAKMI Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 1(3), 143-150.

Suroso, T., Margono, S. S., Wandra, T., & Ito, A. (2006). Challenges for control of taeniasis/cysticercosis in Indonesia. Parasitology International, 55, S161-S165.

Ullo, F., & Marsono, H. D. (2013). Studi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat: Kasus Cagar Alam Pegunungan Arfak, Kabupaten Manokwari Papua Barat (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Vyawahare, M. (2020). China beefs up wildlife trade ban as COVID-19 outbreak intensifies. Mongabay.

Wandra, T., Depary, A. A., Sutisna, P., Margono, S. S., Suroso, T., Okamoto, M., Craig, P. S., & Ito, A. (2006). Taeniasis and cysticercosis in Bali and north Sumatra, Indonesia. Parasitology International, 55, S155-S160.

Widarso, H. S., Margono, S. S., Purba, W. H., & Subahar, R. (2001). Prevalensi dan distribusi taeniasis dan sistiserkosis. Makara Seri Kesehatan, 5, 34-38.

Wolfe, N. D., Daszak, P., Kilpatrick, A. M., & Burke, D. S. (2005). Bushmeat hunting, deforestation, and prediction of zoonotic disease. Emerging infectious diseases, 11(12), 1822.

Yulianto, H., Satrija, F., Lukman, D. W., & Sudarwanto, M. (2015). Seroprevalensi Positif Sistiserkosis pada Babi Hutan di Kabupaten Way Kanan, Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Veteriner, 16(2), 187-195.

Creative Commons License

Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.